Head to head
Cleared- Win share
- 65%
- 95% interval
- 56% – 73%
- Your bar
- 50%
- Dough default
- 50%
78 wins, 42 losses, 8 neither. “Neither” is shown and not counted as a win. Timing-flagged battles are excluded.
Report
Simulated. Not a client study. The sections and the verdict rule are the ones a brand receives.
Concept test · New York
The new label won the pick. It missed the price. One missed bar and the study does not clear.
78 wins, 42 losses, 8 neither. “Neither” is shown and not counted as a win. Timing-flagged battles are excluded.
Anchor $2.49. Generous share 52%. The bar clears only if the conservative count clears it. This is what people say they would pay — not a sales forecast.
You left this bar off. Had it been on, it would be the share who said love it or like it, asked before any choice.
Each pack, rated on its own, before the battle.
n = 120 · top box 33% · top two 68%
n = 120 · top box 23% · top two 53%
Shoppers mark which pack attributes matter most and least. The ranking is a guide to the next design — not a second verdict.
After the choices, shoppers rank the set. Mean pair agreement 64%. Top-pick agreement 71%(112 comparable). Speech and choice are both kept. They are allowed to disagree.
“The new one looks colder. I'd take it if it cost the same.”
“I know the old bottle. This one feels like it is trying.”
“I'd buy the new label at the bodega. Not at that price for the week.”
Emails, links, handles and phone numbers are removed before brands see answers; names are not detected.
The pick says the label can win attention. The price says $2.49 is ahead of what these shoppers will grant it. The next study is a price, or a label that keeps the cold look and spends less effort announcing itself. The report will say if that one clears. It will use the same words.
A person reviews every request and writes back.